On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:49:27AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :I agree 100%. It'd also be good for documentation, because I don't think > :anyone's gone through the docs to do s/_enable//g yet. > > I rather wish pkgsrc used blah_enable instead of overloading the RC > namespace the way they do. I really prefer the _enable version. > I guess it wouldn't be too bad of a hack to support both methods.
Unlikely. The _enable version was a hack FreeBSD added when import NetBSD RC system and it doesn't add any value but creating another function call. Or to make it even blunter: the use of set_rcvar doesn't work on !FreeBSD, !DragonFly at all. Joerg