On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <i...@juanfra.info> wrote: > On 11/07/2011 10:50 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote: >> >> Our C++ dependencies would not be that difficult to overcome and I >> do not see why the system compiler should necessarily have to >> support pkgsrc directly. > > What C++ software or dependencies has DragonFly? I'm curious. > >
Answered in the context of, "What C++ dependencies does DragonFly have and how hard would it be to remove them?" devd(8), groff(1) and binutils gold, we have a C binutils as well though so that is not a hard requirement. mdoc is already staged up to replace groff, someone just needs to put in the labor to get it done. devd is 1200-1300 lines of C++, only part of which is "classy", it should be a straightforward port to C. If someone really wanted to rid DragonFly of its C++ dependencies, it would be fairly easy to do so given how things sit right now. Sam