I started to work on something like what you suggested. I then realized that the element aspect of this would be really tough, but the attribute side would be not too bad. So I'm inclined to go ahead with attributes. Dan even suggests de-qualifying them by default.
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Benson Margulies
- RE: Namespaces on attributes Richard Grantham
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Benson Margulies
- RE: Namespaces on attributes Richard Grantham
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Benson Margulies
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Benson Margulies
- RE: Namespaces on attributes Richard Grantham
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Daniel Kulp
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Benson Margulies
- RE: Namespaces on attributes Richard Grantham
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Benson Margulies
- RE: Namespaces on attributes Richard Grantham
- Re: Namespaces on attributes Benson Margulies
