What does the @WebService annotation look like in this case? Also,
the default generated from the class name might be adequate for this
case. Since your implementer class is GetTmServiceTemplatePort, that
would be the default portname which might just match what's in the
wsdl. Don't really know.
The other possiblility: a LONG LONG time ago, we talked about making
it so that in a wsdl first scenario, if the given service only has a
single port, it would use it if the endpoint name is null. We MAY
have only gotten that working on the server side, but I'm not sure.
It might not be working at all and the above applies. Or possibly we
had to disable it on the client side for tck reasons or something.
I'd definitely have to dig more for that.
Dan
On May 14, 2008, at 6:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dan,
in this case endpointName is missing also here, isn't it? But
everything
seems to work in this case
<jaxws:endpoint
id="endpoint-GetTmServiceTemplatePort"
implementor="#at.....GetTmServiceTemplatePort"
implementorClass="at.....GetTmServiceTemplatePort"
address="/at-lookup-tmservicetemplate-1.0"
wsdlLocation=
"classpath:repository/at-lookup-tmservicetemplate-1.0/at-lookup-
tmservicetemplate-1.0.wsdl"
serviceName="serNs:getTmServiceTemplatePortService"
xmlns:serNs="http://..../tmservicetemplate";
<jaxws:properties>
<entry key="schema-validation-enabled" value=
"true" />
</jaxws:properties>
</jaxws:endpoint>
thanks.
best regards
jano
Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/14/2008 23:37
Bitte antworten an
[email protected]
An
[email protected]
Kopie
Thema
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: empty soap action using
JAXWS/JAXB [Virus checked]
On May 14, 2008, at 5:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Daniel,
thanks for quick answer.
hopefully i'll find more time for debuging tomorow.
but now i want to try the trick with setting also endpoint and also
to use
generated service object.
"actually, you aren't setting an endpointName/portName on the
factory)"
do you mean factory.setEndpointName() with qname of port from wsdl?
Or
something more or different?
Yep. That exactly. The port name from the wsdl.
Dan
best regards
jano
Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/14/2008 23:23
Bitte antworten an
[email protected]
An
[email protected]
Kopie
Thema
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: empty soap action using JAXWS/JAXB
[Virus
checked]
jano,
We might be getting someplace. Thanks for doing some debugging. I
hope you're learning some stuff while doing it. :-)
My main concern is the fact that you are even hitting lines
131/107/202. For a pure wsdl first case with valid values for the
ServiceName/PortName that match the values in the wsdl, that code
should never be reached. (actually, you aren't setting an
endpointName/portName on the factory)
Actually, that looks like it.... Looking at the code, if it cannot
find an endpoint of the given name (you aren't giving it one, so it's
creating a default one that might now mathc the wsdl), it creates a
new endpoint with a new binding.
Can you get the stack trace at that point? That might help figure
out what is going on.
Actually, can you also try using the generated Service object to
create the proxy instead of the JaxWsProxyFactoryBean? If that
works, then I at least know there is something "different" between
the
two and would be another place to start looking.
Dan
On May 14, 2008, at 4:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on return from
public BindingInfo createBindingInfo(ServiceInfo service,
javax.wsdl.Binding binding, String ns) {
result contains operation with BindingOperationInfo with two
extensors -
one SOAPOperationImpl with soapActionUri set to "default" and one
SoapOperationInfo wiht action="default" (looks fine for me)
then on the line 202:
soapOperation.setSoapActionURI(soi.getAction());
return empty string, which seems to be incorrect
ok .. step back...
on line 107: public BindingInfo createBindingInfo(ServiceInfo si,
String
bindingid, Object conf) {
variable "si" contains somewhere inside still correct soap action.
created instance stored in "info" variable doesn't
in fact also Operation info fetched on line 131: for (OperationInfo
op :
si.getInterface().getOperations()) { doesn't contain required
informations
.....
in fact "si" variable contains the same operation twice .. once
somewhere
in bindings[0].operations and second in intf.operations .... for
later
there is not soap action (i mean no extensors .. maybe this is a
problem?)
now i'm a bit lost in unknown code :( but hopefully i helped you a
bit
best regards
jano
Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/13/2008 20:25
Bitte antworten an
[email protected]
An
[email protected]
Kopie
Thema
Re: Antwort: Re: empty soap action using JAXWS/JAXB [Virus checked]
I think I'm going to need a test case that shows this. I just did
some wireshark traces on a bunch of tests and they are all sending
the
SOAPAction properly. There are a bunch of things that would break
if
this wasn't true such as the tck, ws-addressing interop, etc....
For the wsdl first stuff, the soapAction should be pulled from the
WSDL while processing the operations. Specifically, line 540 of
the
SoapBindingFactory.java. That should be grabbing the stuff from the
wsdl extensor and creating the appropriate thing we need.
Dan
On May 13, 2008, at 4:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
wsdls says that soap action is "default" but on the wire it's
sending
nothing.
fragment of wsdl
<wsdl:binding name='getBrandServiceOperationsBinding'
type='tns:getBrandServiceOperations'>
<soap:binding style='document'
transport='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http'/>
<wsdl:operation name='getBrandService'>
<soap:operation soapAction='default'/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap:body use='literal'/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap:body use='literal'/>
</wsdl:output>
<wsdl:fault name='TechnicalExceptionFault'>
<soap:fault name='TechnicalExceptionFault' use='literal'/>
</wsdl:fault>
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:binding>
i didn't find in sources a place, where action is set except the
place,
which is reading action from annotations.
best regards
jano
Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/13/2008 04:34
Bitte antworten an
[email protected]
An
[email protected]
Kopie
Thema
Re: empty soap action using JAXWS/JAXB [Virus checked]
What does the wsdl say for the action field on the operations?
If you create a service from the wsdl, the wsdl is the definitive
contract and is what we use to determine the soap action, not the
annotations.
Dan
On May 7, 2008, at 4:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
i'm using following code to obtain client proxy (some comments in
code)
JaxWsProxyFactoryBean factory = new
JaxWsProxyFactoryBean();
factory.setServiceClass(serviceInterface); // here is
wsdl2java generated port interface (which contains
soapaction="default")
factory.setAddress(address); // service provider
endpoint
factory.setWsdlLocation(wsdlLocation); // in form
classpath:xx.wsdl
factory.setServiceName(QName.valueOf(serviceName)); //
from wsdl
factory.setProperties(new HashMap<String, Object>());
factory.getProperties().put("schema-validation-
enabled",
new Boolean(schemaValidationEnabled)); // true
T port = (T) factory.create();
i'm using cxf 2.1
during initialization it takes buildServiceFromWSDL path in
ReflectionServiceFactoryBean
during this path, it never invoked line like
o.setProperty("action",
getAction(o, method));
which results in missing (empty) soap action .... which doesn't
work
for
system i want to call.
Am I doing something wrongly? Or did i miss something?
I see it as a bug and fix seems to be to add missing magic line
into
initializeWSDLOperation of JaxWsServiceFactoryBean class. There
are
more
places which are good enough for me, but i don't know which is the
best in
general.
best regards
jano
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
