Hmmm. The serialization code that I pasted in below was emitted for a web service that specifies elementFormDefault="qualified", yet as you can see, the generated JS code makes no provision for prefixing the element name:
>> xml = xml + '<'; >> >> xml = xml + elementName; >> >> xml = xml + ' '; -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benson Margulies Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 12:40 PM To: Merritt, Norris; CXF Users Subject: Re: wsdl2js source, serialization strategy, etc. Here's the package-info for the 'fortest' package in the Javascript tests ... @javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSchema(xmlns = { @javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlNs( namespaceURI = "uri:org.apache.cxf.javascript.testns3", prefix = "Plan3") } , elementFormDefault = javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED ) package org.apache.cxf.javascript.fortest; So, one would think that we're doing some qualified elephants. I'll continue to dig. On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are unit tests for a lot of cases here, and I'm sure I've seen > XML prefixes. I don't pretend to have the code generator memorized, so > my approach in a case like this is to see if we've got the right test > case, if not add it, and then watch for the fireworks when I run it. > You are welcome to beat me to a check through the test cases. I don't > have a strong prediction as to whether the code is right and you just > haven't see why, or whether the code is wrong. I'll try to get into > this tonight. > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Merritt, Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks Benson, I located the source, I was momentarily confused because the >> source trees in the source distribution do not follow the package names as >> closely as I expected. I finally found the source under "frontend". >> >> I wanted to look at the source to see about making some enhancements because >> I noticed that the serialization strategy seems to ignore attributes defined >> in the XML schema, and also seems to ignore elementFormDefault, i.e. there >> seems to be no provision for qualifying element names with prefixes during >> serialization. >> >> All of the serialization routines seem to take the following general form: >> >> if (elementName != null) { >> >> xml = xml + '<'; >> >> xml = xml + elementName; >> >> xml = xml + ' '; >> >> xml = xml + 'xmlns:jns0=\'http://xyz.com\'; >> >> if (extraNamespaces) { >> >> xml = xml + ' ' + extraNamespaces; >> >> } >> >> xml = xml + '>'; >> >> } >> >> I don't see how attributes defined on the complex type for which >> "elementName" is being emitted are ever emitted, or how the serialized XML >> would survive validation if elementFormDefault="qualified" was specified in >> the XML schema. Am I missing something? >> >> Thanks, >> Norris >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benson >> Margulies >> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 2:23 PM >> To: Merritt, Norris; CXF Users >> Subject: wsdl2js >> >> Norris, >> >> wsdl2js was subsumed into CXF. Most of the code is inside >> rt/javascript, but the command-line interfaces are in the tools area. >> There is documentation at >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/javascript-clients.html. >> >> --benson >> >
