On Thursday 04 December 2008 2:44:24 am Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I think this really makes sense. Is there already an issue for this task?
Not yet. I really haven't had any time to really think about a 3.0 version. Too busy on 2.x tasks. :-( Dan > > I would combine the following modules: > > cxf-api > cxf-common-schemas > cxf-common-utilities > cxf-rt-core:jar > > That would at least make the set of dependencies cxf produces by itself > smaller. > > The set above depends on: > > [INFO] [dependency:list] > [INFO] > [INFO] The following files have been resolved: > [INFO] aopalliance:aopalliance:jar:1.0:compile > [INFO] com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:jar:2.1.7:compile > [INFO] com.sun.xml.fastinfoset:FastInfoset:jar:1.2.2:compile > [INFO] commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.4:compile > [INFO] commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile > [INFO] javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:jar:2.1:compile > [INFO] javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2:compile > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-api:jar:2.2-SNAPSHOT:compile > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-common-schemas:jar:2.2-SNAPSHOT:compile > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-common-utilities:jar:2.2-SNAPSHOT:compile > [INFO] org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-core:jar:2.2-SNAPSHOT:compile > [INFO] > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-activation_1.1_spec:jar:1.0.2:compile > [INFO] > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec:jar:1.1.1:compile > [INFO] > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec:jar:1.5:compile > [INFO] > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.1:compile > [INFO] org.apache.neethi:neethi:jar:2.0.4:compile > [INFO] org.apache.ws.commons.schema:XmlSchema:jar:1.4.2:compile > [INFO] org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.6:compile > [INFO] org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:2.5.5:compile > [INFO] org.springframework:spring-context:jar:2.5.5:compile > [INFO] org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.5:compile > [INFO] wsdl4j:wsdl4j:jar:1.6.2:compile > [INFO] xml-resolver:xml-resolver:jar:1.2:compile > > Btw. I have found the dependency:analyze goal. This looks like it could > help us. For cxf-rt-core it reported that jaxb-impl is declared but not > used. > > Interestingly it says the following about cxf-api: > > [INFO] [dependency:analyze] > [WARNING] Used undeclared dependencies found: > [WARNING] > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.1:compile > [WARNING] commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.4:compile > [WARNING] javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:jar:2.1:compile > [WARNING] org.easymock:easymock:jar:2.4:test > [WARNING] wsdl4j:wsdl4j:jar:1.6.2:compile > [WARNING] Unused declared dependencies found: > [WARNING] > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec:jar:1.1.1:compile > [WARNING] com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.1.9:test > [WARNING] org.apache.cxf:cxf-common-schemas:jar:2.2-SNAPSHOT:compile > [WARNING] org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.6:compile > [WARNING] com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:jar:2.1.9:test > [WARNING] org.apache.cxf:cxf-xjc-dv:jar:2.2-SNAPSHOT:test > > and for cxf-common-utilities: > [INFO] [dependency:analyze] > [WARNING] Used undeclared dependencies found: > [WARNING] org.easymock:easymock:jar:2.4:test > [WARNING] cglib:cglib-nodep:jar:2.1_3:test > [WARNING] Unused declared dependencies found: > [WARNING] org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.6:test > [WARNING] > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-activation_1.1_spec:jar:1.0.2:test > [WARNING] com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj:saaj-impl:jar:1.3.2:test > [WARNING] xml-resolver:xml-resolver:jar:1.2:compile > > Greetings > > Christian > > Daniel Kulp schrieb: > > Honestly, one of the things I keep thinking about for 3.0 is combining > > common-utilities, api, and rt/core into a single "cxf-kernel" or > > something. common-utilities and api seperation is pretty much useless. > > The utilities are as much a part of the api as the stuff in the api > > module is. The reason they were separated goes WAY WAY back to M1 days > > when the tools didn't depend on core. That reason is now long gone and > > having them separate is almost pointless. > > > > But to this discussion, making the API module depend on less things > > really won't solve the problem at all. You cannot really do anything > > without depending on cxf-rt-core. Thus, if you move a dependency from > > API to core, it doesn't change the fact that it would get pulled in for > > any cxf application. > > > > Dan -- Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dankulp.com/blog
