John Baker wrote:
Of course, that's just the prefixes..
Perhaps I should ask if anyone has any experience with products written around
Axis1 WSDL that failed when using CXF?
One thing I do note is that if I set use=Use.ENCODED, the WDSL generated by
CXF produces use="literal". Why is this?
Cxf doesn't support rpc/encoded, which is quite old style and not
supported by jax-ws.
john
On Sunday 14 December 2008 13:30:36 you wrote:
Hi,
I've used CXF on a few projects and I'm seriously impressed with the
quality of the product. I'm currently porting some old Axis1 webservices
over to CXF and while my new WS works perfectly, I do have a little problem
with the WSDL generated. The problem is that I need a fairly old product
to parse the WSDL and it's currently failing. I don't think this is the
fault of CXF but perhaps CXF can be configured to produce a WSDL that this
old product seems to accept.
I've annotated my interface with the following:
@WebService
@SOAPBinding(style=Style.RPC, use=Use.LITERAL)
and it's producing WSDL for a method as follows:
<wsdl:operation name="authenticate">
<soap:operation soapAction="" style="rpc"/>
<wsdl:input name="authenticate">
<soap:body namespace="http://services.integration.javasystemsolutions.com/";
use="literal"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output name="authenticateResponse">
<soap:body namespace="http://services.integration.javasystemsolutions.com/";
use="literal"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
However Axis1.4 generates the following WSDL:
<wsdl:operation name="authenticate">
<wsdlsoap:operation soapAction=""/>
<wsdl:input name="authenticateRequest">
<wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
namespace="http://ws.webapp.javasystemsolutions.com"; use="encoded"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output name="authenticateResponse">
<wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
namespace="http://localhost:8080/myservice"; use="encoded"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
Why do they look subtly different and is it possible for CXF to be
configured to produce something like Axis, purely for the benefit of a
product that is a bit difficult.. :)
Thanks for the wonderful product.
