On Tue March 31 2009 5:03:59 am Eoghan Glynn wrote: > Well, WS-Addressing version 2005/08 is already supported by CXF, and is > default version used on the wire and the native version used internally in > the stack. > Its only in the special case of WS-A used in conjunction with WS-RM that we > fallback to the older WS-A version 2004/08. This is because the WS-RM 1.0 > spec requires usage of the WS-A version 2004/08 (in fact that requirement > was the whole motivation for implementing multi-version WS-A support in > CXF). > > Now we could follow WCF's example and allow WS-RM 1.0 to be used with the > 2005/08 version of WS-A. While I don't think this is correct from a spec > point of view, we could just be pragmatic and allow it for reasons of > interop.
I would think this is something we would definitely want to do. > It would take a bit of change in the WS-RM layer to make this a > reality though. Any idea how much work? Maybe some pointers to Bryan as to where to look to get started? Dan > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > > 2009/3/30 Bryan Kearney <bkear...@redhat.com> > > > Eoghan Glynn wrote: > >> Hi Bryan, > >> > >> Did you mean the 2006/08 version (as opposed to 2005)? Otherwise known > >> as WS-RM 1.1. > >> > >> Sorry... wsAddressing. I dont know the relationship between addressing > > > > ans WSRm.I was playing with WCF wsDualHttp binding.. and it is sending > > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing > > > > headers. Is that something which is supported? > > > > -- bk -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
