Personally, I don't like such discussions as I find them being of little use and distracting for people working on the
implementation.
Users are not blind and can easily figure out what implementation they'd like
to work with - let them do a bit of home work.
I'd like to remind once again : please keep discussing implementation specific features of concrete JAXRS implementations on the
corresponding user lists - I don't think it's a good etiquette to do otherwise
thanks, Sergey
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
To: <users@cxf.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: What project is the more advanced ?
This might help, it describes the extensions to JAX-RS supported in Jersey...
http://blogs.sun.com/sandoz/entry/jersey_features_and_documentation
2009/4/14 Raphael F. <raf64...@gmail.com>:
Hello everyone.
I wonder what is the project the more advanced between Apache CXF &
Sun Jersey concerning the implementation of JSR 311: JAX-RS ?
Does one of them is more advanced than the other one ? If yes, which one ?
Thanks by advance
--
Raphaël F.
L'avenir de nos Libertés Fondamentales passe par la défense de nos
Libertés Numériques !
Promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre : http://www.april.org/
Les projets numériques liberticides du gouvernement français et de
l'Europe : http://www.laquadrature.net/
OpenOffice.org en images : http://www.csdm.qc.ca/sitsat-mtl/openoffice/index.htm
"Ce qu'il y a de scandaleux dans le scandale, c'est qu'on s'y
habitue." Méditez-y...
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com/
