OK.  I've copied this information over to the page.   It should sync in a 
couple 
hours.  The update is at:
http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/application-server-specific-configuration-guide.html

if you want to take a quick look.


Thanks for figuring that all out!

Dan


On Thu December 17 2009 5:23:55 am Martin Renner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> following the instructions given on
> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/application-server-specific-configuration-guide.
> html#ApplicationServerSpecificConfigurationGuide-Websphere (section "Add
>  your own class loader") it is quite easy to get CXF up and running with
>  WebSphere 6.1.
> 
> I verified the instructions with WebSphere 6.1.0.19 and 6.1.0.27. Maybe you
>  can add these two versions to the above mentioned documentation.
> 
> However, things are getting way more complicated if the Web Services
>  Feature Pack for WebSphere is installed. With this feature pack installed,
>  it is impossible to deploy an application using CXF, because the WebSphere
>  Web Services engine (something based on Axis2:
>  com.ibm.ws.websvcs.deployment.WASAxis2MetaDataProcessor.processWARMetadata
> ) starts parsing the JAX-WS annotations of the services and tries to deploy
>  the services.
> 
> Up to fixpack 27 (6.1.0.27) there was no possibility to disable the
>  WebSphere Web Services engine.
> 
> Two months ago, IBM reacted to the problem and released the following fix:
> 
>   PK96989: ENABLE USE OF THIRD PARTY JAX-WS WEB SERVICES ENGINE IN
>  WEBSPHERE
> 
> This fix requires at least fixpack 27 (6.1.0.27). It allows to disable the
>  WebSphere Web Services engine for the whole JVM by setting the JVM
>  property
> 
>   com.ibm.websphere.webservices.DisableIBMJAXWSEngine=true
> 
> or to disable the engine just for a specific module by adding
> 
>   DisableIBMJAXWSEngine: true
> 
> to WAR/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF.
> 
> According to IBM, this fix shall be included into fixpack 29.
> 
> For details, please see
>  http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=180&uid=swg1PK96989
> 
> 
> Hope that this information may be helpful for some of you.
> 
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Martin
> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Reply via email to