On Wednesday 24 March 2010 11:52:31 pm Gary Gregory wrote: > Is there a reason why CXF ships with Woodstox 3.x instead of 4.x?
Mostly just to not mess with deps on the branch. Trunk (2.3) has switched to 4.x already. Dan > > Thank you, > Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:25 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: what stax implementation is being used by cxf? > > > > We use woodstox until told otherwise. To tell us otherwise, put > > something else in classpath. > > > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, pangea <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I kind of have a feeling that it is using sjsxp? I need some > > > > confirnation > > > > > pls. also is there a way to configure the stax implementation to be > > > > used. > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/what-stax- > > > > implementation-is-being-used-by-cxf--tp28019722p28019722.html > > > > > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog
