I would want to keep the build active as well. You just never know when you'll need to release a critical fix. Then, the last thing you want is to get tripped up by your build infrastructure.
Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer Rocket Software 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 • Atlanta, GA 30326 • USA Tel: +1.404.760.1560 Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 16:18 > To: users@cxf.apache.org > Cc: robert > Subject: Re: 2.2.13? > > On Tuesday 25 January 2011 2:22:43 pm robert wrote: > > Why is there a 2.2.13 snapshot build, if 2.2.12 is the last build in > > the thread? > > > > Referenc: http://cxf.apache.org/download.html > > Could probably take it off that page. There isn't anything really being > merged there. However, I think I'd like to keep the Hudson build in > place. > When we had the security issue last summer, I had a heck of a time getting > the > old branches up and running again (different JDK, different maven, etc....) > so having it pre-setup in Hudson may help if we ever need it. > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog
