On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote: > Not having a SOAP body would seem to violate rule R2710 of the WS-I Basic > Profile > (http://www.ws-i.org/profiles/basicprofile-1.1.html#Operation_Signatures).
This was something that was updated in BP 2.0: http://ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-2.0-2010-11-09.html#Operation_Signatures which allows the body elements to be non-unique as long as the was:Action headers are unique. Dan > > Glen > > On 02/04/2013 10:21 AM, Jesus Castillo wrote: >> Hi Aki, >> >> the information about what service to invoke is not in the SOAP body but in >> the SOAP headers. >> Hence the request has an empty SOAP body. >> >> Rgds, >> >> Jesus. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/NPE-on-MessageModeInInterceptor-when-sending-empty-SOAPBody-tp5722638p5722719.html >> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > Glen Mazza > Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com > blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
