This sounds like an asm jar issue. Can you check what version of ASM is being picked up? Does WebLogic have ASM in it’s system paths someplace?
Dan > On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Mercader, Felix <felix.merca...@firstdata.com> > wrote: > > Hi again Aki > > I tried to use the last CXF version. For that I removed the one I was using > (2.7.12) and I added this one: 3.1.4 > > I clean and build from scratch. Everything fine at building time. > > Then I deployed the Web Service in WebLogic and I got this error/Exception: > > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMCFRE004 unknown bytecode; > class=server/com/omnipay/webservice/webService/jaxws_asm/GetMerchantDetails, > method=setInstitutionNumber(Ljava/lang/String;)V, pc=1 > > I put back version 2.7.12 and I can deploy successfully in WebLogic again. I > put again 3.1.4 just to be sure I did nothing wrong and same error !! > > Any idea ? > > Thanks > flx > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aki Yoshida [mailto:elak...@gmail.com] > Sent: 02 December 2015 12:26 > To: users@cxf.apache.org > Cc: Mercader, Felix > Subject: Re: CXF incorrect WSDL automatically generated ? Please help ! > > which cxf version are you using? > it could be an old bug. > > Questions should go to users@cxf, so I have moved this thread to there.. > > > 2015-12-02 13:07 GMT+01:00 Felix.1973 <felix.merca...@omnipaygroup.com>: >> Hi there. I am fighting the last two days with the same problem and I >> don't know how to fix this. Even not sure if it is an error or not. >> >> I have a CXF Web Service with something I consider very strange and I >> would like to fix. This is one of the calls that the Web Service deals with: >> >> @WebResult (name="merchantHierarchyParentResponse") >> MerchantHierarchyParentResponseDTO >> getParent( >> @WebParam(name="institutionNumber") >> @XmlElement(required=true) String institutionNumber, >> @WebParam(name="clientNumber") String clientNumber, >> @WebParam(name="ourReference") String ourReference, >> @WebParam(name="accessMerch") String accessMerch, >> @WebParam(header=true, name="callerId") String callerId, >> @WebParam(header=true, name="timestamp") String timestamp, >> @WebParam(header=true, name="signature") String signature >> ); >> >> As you can see, it receives 4 normal parameters plus 3 extra >> parameters in the header (callerId, timestamp and signature). >> >> It compiles successfully. Then I deploy it also successfully in a >> WebLogic server. >> >> Finally, I use SoapUI to test it. I provide SoapUI with the URL that >> WebLogic is providing me with the WSDL. This is, I am not doing any >> change in the automatic generated WSDL. This is what I am getting for >> this getParent in SoupUI: >> >> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; >> xmlns:web="http://webService.webservice.omnipay.com.server/";> >> <soapenv:Header> >> * <web:signature>?</web:signature> >> <web:timestamp>?</web:timestamp> >> <web:callerId>?</web:callerId>* >> </soapenv:Header> >> <soapenv:Body> >> <web:getParent> >> <institutionNumber>?</institutionNumber> >> >> <clientNumber>?</clientNumber> >> >> <ourReference>?</ourReference> >> >> <accessMerch>?</accessMerch> >> </web:getParent> >> /* <web:callerId>?</web:callerId> >> <web:timestamp>?</web:timestamp> >> <web:signature>?</web:signature>*/ >> </soapenv:Body> >> </soapenv:Envelope> >> >> My question is very clear. I see the 3 parameters in the header >> section (callerId, timestamp and signature) but why these 3 parameters >> are *AGAIN* at the end in the body part ??? I don't want them in the >> body part, I want them only in the header. >> >> Any idea why this is happening ? Is that normal ? is it a bug ? Thank >> you for your help ! >> >> thanks >> Felix Mercader >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-incorrect-WSDL-automatically-gener >> ated-Please-help-tp5763489.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list >> archive at Nabble.com. > > The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify First Data > immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
