Hmm .. that is a good point. For some of the intents it makes sense to
publish them to the discovery so the client also requires them but for
some it makes no sense.
I will address this on the osgi dev list as I am not sure how to do this
inside the current standard.
In any case what you can already do is implement an intent differently
on the client and server side. So it is the same name but does different
things.
Christian
On 28.09.2016 18:04, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Waiting for the actual feedback from the users makes sense; I guess
the question is if such 'internal' intents should be publishable (ex,
the client does not need to know the server is using a logging
interceptor), may be they can be marked as internal
Sergey
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com
