Hmmm thats what I feared, but thank you. Out of technical curiosity. There is something pristine about method signature, and should not CXF allow to preserve that sugar and provide its annotation(s) to allow the response be wrapped in a ResponseBuilder for the other classes down the layer to implemented.
For example Spring does this beautifully using `@Cache` etc. To alter a signature based on trivial things like cache or no cache seems a bit ugly to me. Not a big deal .. but just trying to understand. If this is discussed, would love if I can be pointed to any discussion existing around it. thank you for your response. -- Sent from: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/cxf-user-f547216.html
