On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should the wsdl basically look like this? > Probably, although you should really ask the designer of the security policy what they security requirements should be. The SignedSupportingToken may or may not be required for both bindings etc. > *Question:* > A side question, if I'm unable to get the wsdl changed (because I don't > control the wsdl), then will the multiple entries for Signature, Timestamp > etc in the soap security header cause issues? > I would imagine so, but it depends on the receiving stack. Colm. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/cxf-user-f547216.html > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
