Thanks for taking this into consideration ! Best regards, Thibaut On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:41 PM Andriy Redko <[email protected]> wrote:
> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7668 to track that. > If someone wants to pick it up right away, please feel free to do so. > Thanks, guys! > > > >> On Mar 5, 2018, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Redko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think this is very legitimate query. At some point JAX-RS 2.1 API > dropped NIO support and the dependecy on Servlet 3.1 API as well, right > before > >> releasing the spec (commit reference > https://github.com/jax-rs/api/commit/a4faa965bbe4d058caa41f56f712fa52fc9600fe#diff-bb05b5ab9309760c3271445278116a2f > ). > >> We could try to make 3.0 the base line (right now it is 3.1) and see if > it breaks something else besides NIO part. What do you think? > > DK> I definitely think that makes sense to me. I didn’t realize Tomcat 7 > hadn’t been updated to Servlet 3.1. Since > DK> it’s still on 3.0, I definitely think we should try and support it, > even if it’s for some reduced level of functionality. > > DK> Dan > > > > > >> Best Regards, > >> Andriy Redko > > > > > >> COh> Hi Andriy, > > >> COh> What do you think of this query? > > > >> COh> Thanks, > > > >> COh> Colm. > > > >> COh> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Thibaut Robert < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> COh> Hi, > > >> COh> When deploying cxf 3.2 on tomcat 7, it breaks because of a hard > dependency > >> COh> on Servlet 3.1 classes in Servlet3ContinuationProvider > >> COh> (javax.servlet.WriteListener), which results in ClassNotFound at > runtime. > > >> COh> Is it expected behavior, or should there be a check for servlet > 3.1 > >> COh> availability like there is for servlet 3 ? > > >> COh> Note this was introduced by [CXF-6882] Initial JAX-RS NIO Write > support. > > >> COh> Regards, > >> COh> Thibaut > > > > > > > >
