Hi Thomas!

> Now the question: What is correct and why? From my understanding the fix with 
> CXF-7317 was wrong and violates rfc2392.
> But maybe someone else could clarify this why CXF-7317 is still ok.

Can you elaborate a bit more on your interpretation of RFC 2392?
There is an example in the RFC:
 "cid:foo4%[email protected]" corresponds to Content-ID: <foo4%[email protected]>

To me the explanation of the PR looked clear that's why a merged it.

Regards
Dennis 

Reply via email to