@mark: +1! regards, gerhard
Am Do., 5. Sept. 2019 um 16:01 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > Probably we will require CDI-2.0 in the future. But there was simply no need > so far. > There was little gain and we would loose backward compatibility. > But of course if there is a good argument and a feature we cannot implement > without upgrading then we will likely do a 2.0. > At least that's my $0.02 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 05.09.2019 um 04:59 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos > > <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > tthanks for the answers . > > > > Yes work very good using cdi 2.0 . > > > > I just thought that the cdi 2.0 is default in 1.9.1 > > > > -- > > > > *Daniel Dias dos Santos* > > Java Developer > > SouJava & JCP Member > > GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos > > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava > > > > > > Em qui, 29 de ago de 2019 às 07:02, Mark Struberg > > <[email protected]> > > escreveu: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> There was really no need to support any feature after 1.0. > >> We have a few things we call via reflection though. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2019, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > >>> Probably 1.0, but we are compatible with 2.0 > >>> > >>> Daniel Dias Dos Santos <[email protected]> schrieb am > >> Mi., > >>> 28. Aug. 2019, 21:24: > >>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> I have an doubt about version of CDI in project. > >>>> > >>>> Currently which version the CDI the deltaspike 1.9.1 that use ? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >> > >> >
