On 3/21/07, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 05:01 AM 3/21/2007, Alex Karasulu wrote: >Youch! Why the switch to LGPL for Logback? Yeah you're right we definitely > >cannot use it :(. OK, this one gets asked frequently. Basically, the license change is to emphasize that logback is a new and different project. Other than that, I find conditions of the LGPL fairly reasonable, but again I am certainly not an expert.
This is a rediculous reason to go LGPL. Let's change the license so it's clear to people that it is a different project? Are you serious? It's clear to us now since we cannot use it. Hani is right you have lost your logging mind. I just want to stick to a single Logging framework and not have to deal with all this confusion every other year. So why is Logback the best implementation out there now? Alex
