On 4/20/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matthew, I'm sorry, but the log you provided are really not suffisant for us to tell you what happened. We need more : 1) which ADS version are you using ? 2) do you have some ADS logs ? 3) can you provide a ldif wher we can see the uid=jimmy entry?
4) Does SugarCRM have a detailed debug log that will show us the search filter used? 5) What do you have in your ApacheDS directory? Thanks !
On 4/20/07, Matthew Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys. I know this is a bit of a specific question, but I have been > able to successfully search and load users from two other Java > products. We use SugarCRM and it has an LDAP option. We've set the > baseDN and the authenticated user to bind as to do the search. The > initial bind of the authenticated user appears to be working fine, but > it seems that the search fails for the user. In Apache LDAP Studio, I'm > able to do a search with the same parameter and it seems to come back > fine. Can anyone shed any light on what error code 80 means to > ApacheDS? The error log follows from SugarCRM: > > DEBUG SugarCRM - Starting user load for jimmy > Fri 20 Apr 2007 02:10:56 PM EDT,249 [26544] DEBUG SugarCRM - ldapauth: > Connecting to LDAP server: rr.dzone.com > Fri 20 Apr 2007 02:10:56 PM EDT,430 [26544] INFO SugarCRM - > ldapauth.ldap_rdn_lookup: Bind succeeded, searching for uid=jimmy > Fri 20 Apr 2007 02:10:56 PM EDT,430 [26544] DEBUG SugarCRM - > ldapauth.ldap_rdn_lookup: base_dn:o=TwoBrokeGuys , > search_filter:(uid=jimmy) > *Fri 20 Apr 2007 02:10:56 PM EDT,514 [26544] FATAL SugarCRM - [LDAP > ERROR][80]Internal (implementation specific) error* > Fri 20 Apr 2007 02:10:56 PM EDT,514 [26544] DEBUG SugarCRM - > ldapauth.ldap_authenticate_user: ldap_rdn_lookup returned bind_user= > Fri 20 Apr 2007 02:10:56 PM EDT,515 [26544] FATAL SugarCRM - SECURITY: > ldapauth: failed LDAP bind (login) by jimmy, could not construct bind_user > Fri 20 Apr 2007 02:10:56 PM EDT,515 [26544] FATAL SugarCRM - SECURITY: > User authentication for jimmy failed > > > Thanks in advance, > Matt > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
