Hi Mike, No 1.5.x is a series of feature releases so new functionality will be added with every micro number of the release. 1.5.0 is the first in the series. 1.5.1 is the next until we decide to freeze the features and start focus on stabilizing them for a 1.6 release.
Keep in mind that odd minor numbers in a branch like 5 in 1.5.x means it's a feature release branch. Even minor numbers are for bug fix releases where there are no new features being added. So 1.6.1 will only include bug fixes for 1.6.0 with no new features added. We intend to add a number of new features for the next 6-8 months on 1.5until we deem it ready for a stable 1.6.0 release. Around this time you'll see some 1.6.0-RCx releases for users to start testing the features for stability. If the users like yourself are happy and there are no big issues then we will release 1.6.0. Alex On 4/30/07, CORUM, M E [AG/1000] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex, I'm on 1.5.0. I assume you mean something after 1.5? MikeC -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Karasulu Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ApacheDS 1.5.0 - Multiple Kerberos KDCs Possible? Mike, I don't think this is possible. Enrique is presently working on adding the ability to support multiple realms however I think this will appear in the 1.5 branch rather than the 1.0 branch. For an update and some time frame I think we can ask Enrique about it. Regards, Alex On 4/29/07, CORUM, M E [AG/1000] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have Kerberos working with ApacheDS 1.5.0 nicely and now I need to > simulate multiple environments if possible. Is it possible to have a > separate domain in a separate partition that has its own separate > Kerberos KDC? I tried doing this by just creating a new partition and > setting up its structure and then adding the entries for the Kerberos > stuff (hostldap, krbtgt, etc...) with a new ldif file into this new > partition. Everything loaded up fine and I can see it all with > JXplorer. However, I'm not sure how I would set the kdc.entryBaseDn in > the server.xml. If I have two entries, neither KDC works. If I have > the original entry that worked before, it continues to work. If I have > only the new entry, it does NOT work. Therefore, I'm wondering if there > is a limitation where you can only have one KDC and it can "only" be the > first one that you set up. I'm hoping to have a KDC to service each > domain/partition if possible. > > MikeC > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------- > This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential > information, and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to > receive such information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments from any > servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is > strictly prohibited. > > > All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, > reading and archival by Monsanto. The recipient of this e-mail is solely > responsible for checking for the presence of "Viruses" or other "Malware". > Monsanto accepts no liability for any damage caused by any such code > transmitted by or accompanying this e-mail or any attachment. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments from any servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is strictly prohibited. All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, reading and archival by Monsanto. The recipient of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of "Viruses" or other "Malware". Monsanto accepts no liability for any damage caused by any such code transmitted by or accompanying this e-mail or any attachment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
