As is probably obvious I'm working on TBird integration. In comparing opends (https://opends.dev.java.net/) with the default configuration and example data the return results are much faster than ADS 1.0 (as noted 1.5 is not working ATM https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-927). Is it just a configuration, storage thing or index thing or a real differential?
I followed the tutorial (as mentioned previously) then loaded the OpenDS example data into ApacheDS via the apacheds eclipse plugin thingy ldif export/import. then I used a regexp For whatever reason a few entries didn't get copied to ApacheDS (probably I missed a limit to 1000 or something). However that should have only affected the results in the other direction. Searches on general things like A or B and specific things like Bonnar or "Bonnar Billoteau" show the same perceivable performance difference. This bears out in both the GUI and Wireshark as to returned result timings. ApacheDS handling thing connection better/faster but OpenDS handling the response in the sub-sub ms rounding error. Thoughts? )
