Hi, Francois wrote: > I attached patches on core-integ and server-integ to show what would > make Scala (and me) happy. They are just here to give you an idea, in > that state they break something like all of your testcases (because of > course the use the convention with a service/ldapServer field, not a > setService/setLdapServer method). > > What do you think about that ? Whould it be possible to switch to > getter/setter injection ?
I wonder if we could support both? Won't it be possible to check if the public fields exist (using getFields()) and if not we could invoke the method. Kind Regards, Stefan
