On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:10 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> We have a customer that wants to programmatically maintain a single group
> of approximately about 80,000 members.
>
:) good

> This group will be updated once per day. I realize that this is a
> non-ideal use of a group, but the requirement is such that a single group
> must include all employees.
>
> I'll be testing this in the next couple days but are there any special
> index or cache considerations for the 'member' attribute in this case?
> Anything to watch out for?
>
> not any from the top of my head atm, but please let us know if you run
into any issues.

> Thanks!
>



-- 
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com

Reply via email to