You should/could create an aux class containing the additional attributes you desire and add the AUX class to the entry, rather than modify an existing "standard" class. -jim ᐧ
-- -jim Jim Willeke On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > Please don't post message to me directly. Post them to the mailing list. > > yes, extending the gtoupOfNames ObjectClass is the standard best practice. > Modifying it is really a wrong idea. You would lose the compatibility with > all the LDAP servers out there, and any migration to a newer version of any > server will require you to modify the standard schema. > > And, no, you won't be in trouble with your client : just explain him that > it's not an option. Ususally, clients are smarter than we think... > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Prasad Bodapati <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Sorry, I have read that but I have missed your suggestion. > > I am writing an API which sync data from ApacheDS to SOLR. > > > > So is that normal to extend the groupOfNames class ? If my client does > not > > do that I might be in trouble. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 31 July 2014 12:32 > > To: Prasad Bodapati > > Subject: Re: Adding mail attribute to objectClass groupOfNames > > > > > Then what is the best way to add mail then ? > > > > Did you read my previous mail ? > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
