On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Accorsi, Carlo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Sir, > We have a production system using ApacheDS that's been running since 2011 > with 80,000+ users. > Emmanuel ,Kiran and the many other contributors have done an amazing job > with this software. Yes, there was a bit of a learning curve and for us > that was easily offset by its cost. If we used MS Azure Active Directory > Basic instead it would run $80K per month. > > THANK YOU Carlo. Not many come forward to say that they use the server at the least, let alone disclosing numbers, thank you. Best Wishes > > -----Original Message----- > From: Onno van der Straaten [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 1:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Uneasy feeling about ApacheDS > > I'm new to ApacheDS and have been trying to setup a working configuration. > Failing. I am abandoning attempts to use this and will recommending > against using ApacheDS on the project I am currently working on. > > There are too many issues, it gives me very uneasy feeling. > > > - I tried the latest release M22, it doesn't work, fails to install on > Ubuntu and CentOS. > - I tried M20, which installs and works but found that studio does not > work DIRSTUDIO-889 > - Previous studio version had another issue. Open configuration does not > work, shows message "OID ads-basedn does not exist!". > - Purportedly studio version should match servers version so I tried > complete new install of M8 of studio and server. This version also > produces > error message on open configuration ATTRIBUTE_TYPE for" OID > ads-dsmaxpdusize does not exist!". > > > My conclusion is that there is no clear stable working ApacheDS release at > this point. That navigating around various issues surrounding combination > of server and studio is time consuming is one thing. The key thing however > is that the many issues raise questions about quality. > Kiran Ayyagari http://keydap.com
