Thank you very much for the help On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 1:07 AM Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you don't care about CPU utilization, busy-wait is the way to go. > Otherwise you can try to usleep() for something like 60-70 us (to lower > the CPU utilization), and then busy-wait for the rest of the interval (so > that you still have maximum precision). > > You may want to have a look at this > https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article/61/6/808/4259797 , specially > sections 4.3 and 4.1. > > Cheers, > Vincenzo > > Il giorno dom 28 ott 2018 alle ore 09:01 Sungho Hong < > maverickji...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> Thank you very much for the reply. >> But in that case, should I busy wait, to create the delay? >> >> >> > > -- > Vincenzo >
