Hi Asaf, Thanks for your quick answer. I’m trying to upgrade, will update you shortly. However I think from reading the full email thread
https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/dm8pr12mb5494459b49353faccacef3c3cd...@dm8pr12mb5494.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/t/#mc9927dd8f5f092d5042d95fa520b29765d17ddf8 that upgrade is not fixing this problem (at least it didn’t fix it for Yan FWICS) So please check on your side if possible. Reproducing the problem just requires overloading the receiver side with too many PPS… Thanks a lot, Francesco From: Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 6:28 AM To: Francesco Montorsi <francesco.monto...@infovista.com>; Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>; Gerry Wan <ger...@stanford.edu>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com> Cc: Martin Weiser <martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com>; David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>; users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets CAUTION: External Email : Be wary of clicking links or if this claims to be internal. Hello Francesco, To ensure the issue still exists, could you try the latest 19.11 LTS? 19.11.5 is a bit out dated and doesn't contain a lot of DPDK fixes. In the meanwhile, I'll check internally about this issue and update. Regards, Asaf Penso ________________________________ From: Francesco Montorsi <francesco.monto...@infovista.com<mailto:francesco.monto...@infovista.com>> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 1:53:43 AM To: Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com<mailto:xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>>; Gerry Wan <ger...@stanford.edu<mailto:ger...@stanford.edu>>; Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com<mailto:as...@nvidia.com>>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com<mailto:viachesl...@nvidia.com>>; Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com<mailto:ma...@nvidia.com>>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com<mailto:rasl...@nvidia.com>> Cc: Martin Weiser <martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com<mailto:martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com>>; David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com<mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>>; users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org> <users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>> Subject: RE: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets Hi all, I hit the exact same problem reported by Yan. I’m using: * 2 Mellanox CX5 MT28800 installed on 2 different servers, connected together * Device FW (as reported by DPDK): 16.31.1014 * DPDK 19.11.5 (from 6WindGate actually) I sent roughly 360M packets from one server to the other using “testpmd” (in -forward-mode=txonly). My DPDK application on the other server is reporting the following xstats counters (: CounterName PORT0 PORT1 TOTAL rx_good_packets: 76727920, 0, 76727920 tx_good_packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_good_bytes: 4910586880, 0, 4910586880 tx_good_bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_missed_errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_errors: 0, 0, 0 tx_errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_mbuf_allocation_errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q0packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q0bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q0errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q1packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q1bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q1errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q2packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q2bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q2errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q3packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q3bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q3errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q4packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q4bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q4errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q5packets: 76727920, 0, 76727920 rx_q5bytes: 4910586880, 0, 4910586880 rx_q5errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q6packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q6bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q6errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q7packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q7bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q7errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q8packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q8bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q8errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q9packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q9bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q9errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q10packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q10bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q10errors: 0, 0, 0 rx_q11packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_q11bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_q11errors: 0, 0, 0 tx_q0packets: 0, 0, 0 tx_q0bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_wqe_err: 0, 0, 0 rx_port_unicast_packets: 360316064, 0, 360316064 rx_port_unicast_bytes: 23060228096, 0, 23060228096 tx_port_unicast_packets: 0, 0, 0 tx_port_unicast_bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_port_multicast_packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_port_multicast_bytes: 0, 0, 0 tx_port_multicast_packets: 0, 0, 0 tx_port_multicast_bytes: 0, 0, 0 rx_port_broadcast_packets: 0, 0, 0 rx_port_broadcast_bytes: 0, 0, 0 tx_port_broadcast_packets: 0, 0, 0 tx_port_broadcast_bytes: 0, 0, 0 tx_packets_phy: 0, 0, 0 rx_packets_phy: 0, 0, 0 rx_crc_errors_phy: 0, 0, 0 tx_bytes_phy: 0, 0, 0 rx_bytes_phy: 0, 0, 0 rx_in_range_len_errors_phy 0, 0, 0 rx_symbol_err_phy: 0, 0, 0 rx_discards_phy: 0, 0, 0 tx_discards_phy: 0, 0, 0 tx_errors_phy: 0, 0, 0 rx_out_of_buffer: 0, 0, 0 So rx_good_packets is roughly 76M pkts, while rx_port_unicast_packets has counted correctly all 360M pkts sent by testpmd. Of course my application layer has been able to dequeue from the DPDK port only 76M pkts so the remaining (rx_port_unicast_packets- rx_good_packets) got lost but are not reported in the “imissed” counter or “ierrors” counter of rte_eth_stats… It would be not so easy for me to test against latest DPDK… also from what Yan has reported, the issue is still there in DPDK stable 20.11.3… @Mellanox maintainers: any update on this issue? Is there a workaround to get the dropped packet back into the rte_eth_stats counters? Thanks Francesco Montorsi From: Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com<mailto:xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 2:44 AM To: Gerry Wan <ger...@stanford.edu<mailto:ger...@stanford.edu>>; Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com<mailto:as...@nvidia.com>>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com<mailto:viachesl...@nvidia.com>>; Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com<mailto:ma...@nvidia.com>>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com<mailto:rasl...@nvidia.com>> Cc: Martin Weiser <martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com<mailto:martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com>>; David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com<mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>>; users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org> Subject: RE: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets Hi, Yes, it’s always zero… It seems dpdk-stable-20.11-3 already include this patch. [xiaopiya@fedora30 dpdk-stable-20.11.3]$ patch -p1 < ./4-4-net-mlx5-fix-imissed-statistics.diff patching file drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] ^C [xiaopiya@fedora30 dpdk-stable-20.11.3]$ grep -r "mlx5_queue_counter_id_prepare" ./ ./drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c:mlx5_queue_counter_id_prepare(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) ./drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c: mlx5_queue_counter_id_prepare(eth_dev); ./drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c.rej:+mlx5_queue_counter_id_prepare(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) ./drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c.rej:+ mlx5_queue_counter_id_prepare(eth_dev); ./4-4-net-mlx5-fix-imissed-statistics.diff:+mlx5_queue_counter_id_prepare(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) ./4-4-net-mlx5-fix-imissed-statistics.diff:+ mlx5_queue_counter_id_prepare(eth_dev); Thank you. Best regards Yan Xiaoping From: Gerry Wan <ger...@stanford.edu<mailto:ger...@stanford.edu>> Sent: 2021年10月28日 9:58 To: Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com<mailto:xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>> Cc: Martin Weiser <martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com<mailto:martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com>>; David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com<mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>>; Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com<mailto:as...@nvidia.com>>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com<mailto:viachesl...@nvidia.com>>; Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com<mailto:ma...@nvidia.com>>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com<mailto:rasl...@nvidia.com>>; users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets Are the rx_missed_errors/rx_out_of_buffer counters always showing 0 no matter how fast you push your generator? I had a similar issue with missing counters on DPDK 20.11 that was fixed on 21.05 by applying this patch: http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1614249901-307665-5-git-send-email-ma...@nvidia.com/<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F1614249901-307665-5-git-send-email-matan%40nvidia.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672638495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=O%2Fd818GhhnZb3xUZAK15lZFVp73ZltqF3kO%2BIaBY%2BMA%3D&reserved=0> Potentially relevant thread: https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/CAAcwi38rs2Vk9MKhRGS3kAK+=dyanddect7f+ts-f13cany...@mail.gmail.com/<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Finbox.dpdk.org%2Fusers%2FCAAcwi38rs2Vk9MKhRGS3kAK%2B%3DdYAnDdECT7f%2BTs-f13cANYB%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672648450%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=2qRelR3%2BUh033ssOToqg8ehwtAf1S62w1Jevnw53ovI%3D&reserved=0> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:39 PM Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com<mailto:xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>> wrote: Hi, I checked the counter from PF with ethtool -S, there is no counter named 'rx_prio0_buf_discard' Anyway, I checked all counters from ethtool output, there is not any counter reflects the dropped packets. Any suggestion from mlx maintainer? @Matan Azrad @Asaf Penso @Slava Ovsiienko @Raslan Darawsheh Thank you. Best regards Yan Xiaoping -----Original Message----- From: Martin Weiser <martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com<mailto:martin.wei...@allegro-packets.com>> Sent: 2021年10月27日 15:54 To: Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com<mailto:xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>>; David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com<mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>> Cc: Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com<mailto:as...@nvidia.com>>; users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com<mailto:viachesl...@nvidia.com>>; Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com<mailto:ma...@nvidia.com>>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com<mailto:rasl...@nvidia.com>> Subject: Re: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets Hi, you may want to check the counter 'rx_prio0_buf_discard' with ethtool (which is not available in DPDK xstats as it seems that this counter is global for the card and not available per port). I opened a ticket a while ago regarding this issue: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D749&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672658409%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=iOTZvrC8U6kpVaO2v7GvXoMbSm8jiFZoN2El2XcS34E%3D&reserved=0> Best regards, Martin Am 27.10.21 um 08:17 schrieb Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou): > Hi, > > I tried with dpdk 20.11-3 downloaded from > https://fast.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-20.11.3.tar.xz<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffast.dpdk.org%2Frel%2Fdpdk-20.11.3.tar.xz&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672658409%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=fVghxKTm5tMmLLE9cSoK7Ga3HFLYBIsbqsdAeZsxFsM%3D&reserved=0> > Problem still exist: > 1. there is packet loss with 2mpps (small packet), 2. no counter for > the dropped packet in NIC. > > traffic generator stats: sends 41990938, receives back 41986105, lost > 4833 testpmd fwd stats: RX-packets: 41986110, TX-packets: 41986110 > port xstats: rx_unicast_packets: 41990938 (all packets reached to the NIC > port), rx_good_packets: 41986111 (some is lost), but there is not any counter > of the lost packet. > > Here is the log: > [root@up-0 /]# dpdk-testpmd -l "2,3" --legacy-mem --socket-mem > "5000,0" -a 0000:03:06.7 -- -i --nb-cores=1 --portmask=0x1 --rxd=512 > --txd=512 > EAL: Detected 28 lcore(s) > EAL: Detected 2 NUMA nodes > EAL: Detected static linkage of DPDK > EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket > EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'VA' > EAL: No available hugepages reported in hugepages-2048kB > EAL: Probing VFIO support... > EAL: Probe PCI driver: mlx5_pci (15b3:1018) device: 0000:03:06.7 > (socket 0) > mlx5_pci: cannot bind mlx5 socket: Read-only file system > mlx5_pci: Cannot initialize socket: Read-only file system > EAL: No legacy callbacks, legacy socket not created Interactive-mode > selected > testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mb_pool_0>: n=155456, size=2176, > socket=0 > testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc > > Warning! port-topology=paired and odd forward ports number, the last port > will pair with itself. > > Configuring Port 0 (socket 0) > Port 0: 7A:9A:8A:A6:86:93 > Checking link statuses... > Done > testpmd> port stop 0 > Stopping ports... > Checking link statuses... > Done > testpmd> vlan set filter on 0 > testpmd> rx_vlan add 767 0 > testpmd> port start 0 > Port 0: 7A:9A:8A:A6:86:93 > Checking link statuses... > Done > testpmd> set fwd 5tswap > Set 5tswap packet forwarding mode > testpmd> start > 5tswap packet forwarding - ports=1 - cores=1 - streams=1 - NUMA > support enabled, MP allocation mode: native Logical Core 3 (socket 0) > forwards packets on 1 streams: > RX P=0/Q=0 (socket 0) -> TX P=0/Q=0 (socket 0) > peer=02:00:00:00:00:00 > > 5tswap packet forwarding packets/burst=32 > nb forwarding cores=1 - nb forwarding ports=1 > port 0: RX queue number: 1 Tx queue number: 1 > Rx offloads=0x200 Tx offloads=0x0 > RX queue: 0 > RX desc=512 - RX free threshold=64 > RX threshold registers: pthresh=0 hthresh=0 wthresh=0 > RX Offloads=0x200 > TX queue: 0 > TX desc=512 - TX free threshold=0 > TX threshold registers: pthresh=0 hthresh=0 wthresh=0 > TX offloads=0x0 - TX RS bit threshold=0 > > testpmd> show fwd stats all > > ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 0 > ---------------------- > RX-packets: 41986110 RX-dropped: 0 RX-total: 41986110 > TX-packets: 41986110 TX-dropped: 0 TX-total: 41986110 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------ > > testpmd> show port xstats 0 > ###### NIC extended statistics for port 0 > rx_good_packets: 41986111 > tx_good_packets: 41986111 > rx_good_bytes: 3106973594 > tx_good_bytes: 3106973594 > rx_missed_errors: 0 > rx_errors: 0 > tx_errors: 0 > rx_mbuf_allocation_errors: 0 > rx_q0_packets: 41986111 > rx_q0_bytes: 3106973594 > rx_q0_errors: 0 > tx_q0_packets: 41986111 > tx_q0_bytes: 3106973594 > rx_wqe_errors: 0 > rx_unicast_packets: 41990938 > rx_unicast_bytes: 3107329412 > tx_unicast_packets: 41986111 > tx_unicast_bytes: 3106973594 > rx_multicast_packets: 1 > rx_multicast_bytes: 114 > tx_multicast_packets: 0 > tx_multicast_bytes: 0 > rx_broadcast_packets: 5 > rx_broadcast_bytes: 1710 > tx_broadcast_packets: 0 > tx_broadcast_bytes: 0 > tx_phy_packets: 0 > rx_phy_packets: 0 > rx_phy_crc_errors: 0 > tx_phy_bytes: 0 > rx_phy_bytes: 0 > rx_phy_in_range_len_errors: 0 > rx_phy_symbol_errors: 0 > rx_phy_discard_packets: 0 > tx_phy_discard_packets: 0 > tx_phy_errors: 0 > rx_out_of_buffer: 0 > tx_pp_missed_interrupt_errors: 0 > tx_pp_rearm_queue_errors: 0 > tx_pp_clock_queue_errors: 0 > tx_pp_timestamp_past_errors: 0 > tx_pp_timestamp_future_errors: 0 > tx_pp_jitter: 0 > tx_pp_wander: 0 > tx_pp_sync_lost: 0 > testpmd> q > Command not found > testpmd> exit > Command not found > testpmd> quit > Telling cores to stop... > Waiting for lcores to finish... > > ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 0 > ---------------------- > RX-packets: 41986112 RX-dropped: 0 RX-total: 41986112 > TX-packets: 41986112 TX-dropped: 0 TX-total: 41986112 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------ > > Best regards > Yan Xiaoping > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand > <david.march...@redhat.com<mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>> > Sent: 2021年10月18日 18:45 > To: Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) > <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com<mailto:xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>> > Cc: Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com<mailto:as...@nvidia.com>>; > users@dpdk.org<mailto:users@dpdk.org>; Slava Ovsiienko > <viachesl...@nvidia.com<mailto:viachesl...@nvidia.com>>; Matan Azrad > <ma...@nvidia.com<mailto:ma...@nvidia.com>>; Raslan > Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com<mailto:rasl...@nvidia.com>> > Subject: Re: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and > rx_good_packets > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:28 AM Yan, Xiaoping (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) > <xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com<mailto:xiaoping....@nokia-sbell.com>> wrote: >> I have cloned dpdk code from github >> >> [xiaopiya@fedora30 dpdk]$ git remote -v origin >> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk.git<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDPDK%2Fdpdk.git&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672668364%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=qlvhIwbxXnFWVWGTCjnC4UaVKjbF0zJxvRbCoML%2F5t0%3D&reserved=0> >> (fetch) origin >> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk.git<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDPDK%2Fdpdk.git&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672678320%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=30njvUV8ajAT4h%2F7vyYLU4cc2pg0Z%2BqAQEXnS80QyfY%3D&reserved=0> >> (push) >> >> which tag should I use? >> >> Or do I have to download 20.11.3 from >> git.dpdk.org<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672678320%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=yeGXXjj25C9SC9cbuAc5C8So5Oh2y5ecp2CY%2Fy5l0nc%3D&reserved=0>? >> >> Sorry, I don’t know the relation between >> https://github.com/DPDK<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDPDK&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672688274%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=bzTxj8L67Zb9RoB2vJo7Yf%2BgySFmEmoh4VwctjW5z%2FA%3D&reserved=0> >> and >> git.dpdk.org<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672698232%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=VErWzht6Xt7aZy7GySwtalqaO%2FAFvT7LB9H7GX7Z7%2Fs%3D&reserved=0>? > Github DPDK/dpdk repo is a replication of the main repo hosted on > dpdk.org<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672698232%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=XxOeU31Ly5ivlW6k5I2fOPtm%2BUsk9Gluiz2%2FQno3wRM%3D&reserved=0> > servers. > > The official git repos and releases tarballs are on > dpdk.org<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672708178%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=9Rl%2B7orXERAkGx3UcbYxui15ZA%2FQz7OCjppQLYDIlRk%3D&reserved=0> > servers. > The list of official releases tarballs is at: > http://core.dpdk.org/download/<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcore.dpdk.org%2Fdownload%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672718142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=XcLFeiKA3K%2FoqFUO%2FYuxH5b8tiR7vM%2FeA4GqPwfu4Ug%3D&reserved=0> > The main repo git is at: > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672718142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=qlDpNkuGwQtvxIsvLILICCxqstJiyfkzTQPJGTwHx3Q%3D&reserved=0> > The LTS/stable releases repo git is at: > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancesco.montorsi%40infovista.com%7Cd92ebaad8d134670b84308d9a4d3fde6%7Cc8d853de982e440492ffb4189dc94e37%7C0%7C0%7C637722055672728100%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=3HKMv%2Bj9vC9ZoyPIdme%2BOxXHFPrjqjTzu5%2BQX02F5Bk%3D&reserved=0> > > > -- > David Marchand >
