Hi Stephen, I saw your response to more mempools and cache behavior. I have a goal to support 2x100G next, and if I can't get 10G with DPDK then something is seriously wrong.
Should I build the dpdk static libraries with LTO? Thanks, Ed -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 10:50 AM To: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@arknetworks.am> Cc: Lombardo, Ed <ed.lomba...@netscout.com>; users <users@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: dpdk Tx falling short External Email: This message originated outside of NETSCOUT. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 15:44:50 +0400 (+04) Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@arknetworks.am> wrote: > Hi Ed, > > You say there is only one mempool. Why? > Have you tried using dedicated mempools, one per each port pair (0,2), (3,4)? > > Thank you. > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025, Lombardo, Ed wrote: More mempools can make cache behavior worse not better.
