> On Oct 22, 2015, at 8:05 PM, Justin Sherrill <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The question is: will you continue to maintain it, even if that's just > making sure it performs as advertised, for the foreseeable future? > Otherwise, it will bit-rot. Yes, I'm willing to do so. I've been interested in this topic for a while. > > The one repeated reference to SLAAC that I've seen is that it's needed > to get Android clients on a IPv6 network; they won't talk DHCPv6. > Haven't tried it (yet) so I can't describe it better. I think I read about that recently too.
I have an Nexus tablet here and an IPv6-only network with a DragonFly router running the recent rtadvd (the one that sends the DNS config). The Nexus got an address and was able to resolve names. That doesn't say anything about its support about DHCPv6 (which isn't running on this network), but it does indicate that has a fairly comprehensive SLAAC implementation. It self-assigns an address on the v6 network, sets a working route and configures its resolver, all based on the information in the router advertisements. Chuck
