On 10/23/17 10:58, karu.pruun wrote:
Hello
Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that
caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable.
Apart from HAMMER2, could you possibly tell more about what are you
missing (list or privately)? This may help improve things in the
future.
One thing I always wanted to have again is a revival of the GUI iso
image. It would be ideal to test newly bought hardware like laptops
without the need to install it permanently on disk (I feel uneasy to
return that piece of hardware in case I have installed sth. on disk).
Regards,
Michael
Cheers
Peeter
--
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
<paag...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
After I got DFly running on my old Optimus laptop, I got an exception from
the hammer module and wasn't able to recover it. I gave FreeBSD 11.1 a try
and have almost everything I need running much more out of the box than with
DFly. You are getting better and I will put my notes on getting it running
on Optimus in the WIKI, but it's not yet where I need it to be.
Sorry, /PA
El 23 oct. 2017 1:59, "Antonio Olivares" <olivares14...@gmail.com> escribió:
On Sunday, October 22, 2017, Carsten Mattner <carstenmatt...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Is HAMMER2 considered experimental and not for production data?
That is what the 5.0 release page states:
https://www.dragonflybsd.org/release50/
Do we have debug_fs file restoration tools, in case things goes south?
This is being worked on. A new iso with the restoration tools is in the
works, I have to find out where I read this to point it out.
Best Regards,
Antonio
--
NTECS Consulting
www.ntecs.de
Michael Neumann
+49 (0) 178 167 0649
mneum...@ntecs.de
