On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:47 , Frank Loeffler <kn...@cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 06:41:55PM +0100, Ian Hinder wrote: >> Erik and I have been working on automating the tests of the ET for the >> upcoming release. The current status can be viewed (work in progress) here: >> >> >> https://build.barrywardell.net/view/EinsteinToolkitMulti/job/EinsteinToolkitReport-sandbox/ > > Neat. On some of these machines I currently also run the tests because I > didn't know about these. Oh well. > >> These results are up-to-date as of now. Shall I commit them to the >> release-info repository (and continue to do so periodically)? > > Please, as long as they are newer than existing results. However, with > so many failures on hopper and gordon, and also orca, we cannot mention > them as 'supported'. Is the reason for this known? Kraken and BW are > borderline as well, but the failing tests there are mostly not in > critical thorns. The reasons are not known. I briefly looked at Hopper; it seems the test cases segfault. That may have something to do with too aggressive optimization. -erik -- Erik Schnetter <schnet...@cct.lsu.edu> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/ My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu/.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
