On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:16:25PM -0500, Frank Loeffler wrote: > Please consider joining the weekly Einstein Toolkit phone call at > 10 am US central time on Mondays. As usual, you can find instructions > how to join on the following web site:
Something I would like to quickly discuss is a small issue that I believe is still open concerning the repository rearrangement. The current list can be found here: https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Repository_transition The issue is that it is not clear (at least to me, and not in that list) what to do with thorns that have 'attachment/test' thorns, like GRHydro / GRHydro_Init_Data MoL / TestMoL From a developers point it would be nice to have them in the same repository - which would, in the current state of things mean in the same arrangement. However, logically they don't belong there (e.g. GRHydro_Init_Data does not belong in EinsteinEvolve). Possible solutions would be (not sorted in any way, especially not my preference): - put things that technically belong together in one repository and use the symlink-hack to point from different arrangements to the same repository in repos. - put test thorns (GRHydro_Init_Data/TestMoL) into test repositories (CactusTest / EinsteinTest). - create arrangements for such units, and put all thorns in that. This would mean, e.g., arrangements/GRHydro/GRHydro and arrangements/GRHydro/GRHydro_Init_Data Essentially it boils down to three questions: - Which arrangements should these thorns be in? - Which repositories should these thorns be in? - Should the first two be the same (then the repo could be directly checked out into arrangements/). Frank
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
