On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:59, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 24 Jul 2015, at 14:13, Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I just pushed all the changes related to the McLachlan-rewrite merge. Apart >> from the McLachlan Kranc scripts and the respective generated code, there >> are a few thorns that needed to have test results updated. >> >> I see zero test failures with these changes on Bethe, Blue Waters, Carver, >> Datura, Edison, Hopper, Mike, Nvidia (a Perimeter workstation), Philip, >> Queen Bee, Shelob, and Stampede. > > Hi Erik, > > It looks like there are some issues with backward compatibility. I get this > error: > > WARNING[L2,P0] (Cactus): ParameterSetKeyword: Unable to set keyword > 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition', new value 'static' is not in any active > range > WARNING[L1,P0] (Cactus): Major error in parameter file > '/lustre/datura/ianhin/simulations/einsteintoolkit/rewrite_ML_BSSN_bench_o4/output-0000/ML_BSSN_bench.par' > line 30: Range error setting parameter 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition' > to 'static'
Also, any output parameters referring to the old variables are now invalid; e.g. phi has been renamed phiW. Given this, it looks like old parameter files will very likely all have to be modified for the new version. -- Ian Hinder http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
