Hi Frank, How was the performance of KNL? I had a chance to run qc0 on a KNL test machine here (single node). It was 4.6x slower than Haswell 2.3GHz (AVX). The tests were done with -O1 option to bypass the issue of Intel 17.
More on the machine: KNL 7230 Centos 7.2 with xppsl-1.4.3 Intel compiler 17.0.1 Quadrant mode Cache/Flat modes tested with AVX512/AVX2/AVX Vectors thorn is going to be updated for AVX512? Please take a look at the attached option file. Hee Il 2016-11-23 6:42 GMT+09:00 Frank Loeffler <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 04:37:19PM -0500, rahul kashyap wrote: > >> Let me port first and then I'll follow your instructions for the tests. >> > > I've put together an experimental simfactory entry to the new nodes. It > runs, and tests pass (except the ones from Dissipation). It should be > considered experimental because it does not fully implement proper logging > in, and I also used a compute node to compile (because I didn't want to > mess with cross-compiling on my first try). This works, but makes using the > machine a bit more 'hand-work' than others. > > I'll upload those soon to simfactory, marked as 'experimental'. > > Frank > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >
knl_et.cfg
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
