Present: Maria H., Steve B., Roland H., Zack E., Peter S., Atul K., Beyhan K., 
Federico C., Peter D. Yosef Z.


Chair: Zach E.

Minutes: Maria H.


The chair Zach E. started to meeting. The main focus of the meeting was to 
decide what codes will be included in the next release, because Today is the 
feature freeze.  He reported that due to Helvi's absence from the meeting, no 
update was available on Baikal.

Steve B. presented the status of PreSync, and he reported that he is updating 
the documentation. He made the case that it will be good for the current grant 
if PreSync will be included in the current release.

Zach E. requested confirmation from the reviewer that Presync runs without 
interfering with the old code.

Steve B. argued that backward compatibility could be damaging because it 
sacrifices functionality.

Roland H. confirmed that PreSync is safe, and a new test was introduced 
Yesterday for consistency check. Although he admits that PreSync would benefit 
from more time, he is of the opinion that it can be included in the next 
release, because it does not present any danger. He does not fully trust its 
functionality, especially the automatic synchronization, because it was not 
tested with BBH simulations.

Zach E. and Federico C. requested more information, on known cases where 
PreSync failed, and how the new macros are used.

Roland H. and Steve B. confirmed that PreSync is off by default and agreed to 
enable more flags to warn the user if PreSync is activated. Steve B. explained 
that the macros only provide with consistency check that the user is doing what 
was supposed to, and specified that there is a warn only mode that can be used 
to improve code.

Zach E. called to vote on the inclusion of PreSync in the future release, and 
all voted in flavor.

Zach continued the discussion with Baikal and asked for a vote, mentioning that 
although the reviewer was not on the call, she confirmed by email that the 
review is ongoing.

Federico asked for clarification on the support BSSN will be supported, if 
Baikal will be included, and Zach confirmed that BSSN will continue to be 
supported, although he emphasized that Baikal gives better performance.

Roland opposed the vote without confirmation from the reviewer, and required 
for Helvi to put an OK note in the ticket.

Zach suggested two conditions that will disqualify Baikal from making into the 
next release (1) any new feature, and (2) incomplete review.

Roland agreed with the two amendments and brought to attention that there are 2 
more disqualifying conditions: lack on testing on clusters, and lack of gallery 
examples.

Zach mentioned that the code was extensively tested by Roland on clusters by 
Roland, and that it does not require any gallery examples. Roland agreed, and 
Zach called to vote.

All were in favor of including Baikal into the new release, pending the two 
conditions, and Zach, who abstained from vote, thanked for the support of his 
code.

Roland brought to attention the tickets for review. Steve reported that the 
post-processing for the test suites were approved by Peter, however Roland had 
an objection, requesting the output on log files, and compatibility with 
SymFactory. Steve agreed to make the changes.

Zach went to the next item on the agenda, namely deprecation warnings. Roland 
asked Peter D. about the status of the summation by partos ticket. Peter 
reported that by using the minimal bandwidth form, there will be minimal change 
to the code. After a discussion on how to report this change -- as deprecated 
feature or bug, decision was made to report it as deprecation and include it in 
the master branch after release.

Zach went on the status of the gallery testsuites. He reported that TOV with 
BSSN and Illinois codes are OK, and that Shawn L. confirmed the BNS example.

Peter S. and Atul K. talked about their progress with the BBH gallery testing 
and reporting on their effort to find an agreement between the ETK simulation 
and the measurements from the first LIGO detection. Atul uses Simulation Tools 
for visualization and informed that the sample data on the Gallery example 
works fine.

Roland announced the feature freeze and requested that all the gallery examples 
to be re-run with the new ETK version.

Steve will push today the new version of McLaughlin, and Roland mentioned that 
the changes affected the Kranc generator,  and although none of the results 
should change, the check should be done.

Peter S. expressed concern that the runs will be finished in time, but Rolland 
assuaged his worries.

Zach reported that Bill G. was successful in running the Poisson gallery with 
the development version and is in the process of running Visit to make the 
plots. He will re-run after the code freeze.

Zach raised a question about running a 1D wave asked by one of Feredico's 
students. Steve and Maria recommended to use the 3D grid with minimal number of 
points in the other 2 coordinates.

Lastly, Zach required volunteers for chair and minute takers for the next two 
meeting. On may 21, Roland will be chair and Federico minute taker. On may 28, 
Steve will be the chair, and Roland the minute taker.

After this decision was made on this regard, the meeting adjourned.


I am attaching the file Bill G. provided through Zach E.


take care,

Maria



_______________________
Maria C. Babiuc Hamilton, Ph.D.
Professor, Department of Physics
College of Science, Marshall University,
1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV, 25755
Room S 257, Phone: (304)696-2754

Attachment: pEpkey.asc
Description: pEpkey.asc

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to