Marcel Offermans wrote:
However, if I'm not mistaken, chances are high that this issue will be resolved in 1.0.4 (if I understand Karl correctly). Feel free to try the current trunk to see if that works already without that property.

Yes, Karl added a bunch of "well known" protocol package prefixes, so hopefully this type of issue will not be as common in the future.

-> richard

Greetings, Marcel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to