Thank you for your help, and your clarification about osgi specs. 

I wanted to install the same bundle several times to create several instances 
of a UPnP control point, and it seemed that this would fit perfectly for this 
usage, "isolating" the different instances into separate bundles.

I'm looking for a replacement solution.

Thanks.

Ronan Dunklau  


Le Thursday 22 May 2008 13:54:36 Stuart McCulloch, vous avez écrit :
> 2008/5/22 Ronan Dunklau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm trying to install bundles through the method:
> > BundleContext.installBundle(String location, InputStream stream)
> > and i'm experiencing problems with it.
> >
> >
> > I receive an Exception :
> >
> >
> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Bundle symbolic name and version are
> > not
> > unique.
> >         at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.createModule(Felix.java:3425)
> >         at
> > org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.createBundleInfo(Felix.java:3349)
> >         at
> > org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.installBundle(Felix.java:2315) at
> > org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.installBundle(Felix.java:2229) at
> > .....
> >
> > The bundle i'm trying to install is already installed, but under another
> > name
> > than location.
> >
> > Maybe i did not understand the usage of this method:  location is
> > supposed to
> > be a unique identifier for this bundle ? If this is the case, why do i
> > get this Exception ?
> >
> > I took a look to the code of Felix, and it appears that it checks Bundle
> > Symbolic Name and Version to be unique ( as i could guess by the
> > exception message :) ). Why ?
>
> yes, the location of each installed bundle should be unique
> - see the core spec, section 4.3.3 page 82 - and that if you
> try to install a bundle with an existing location then you will
> get back the already installed bundle for that location.
>
> however, note the reference to bundle validity:
>
>    "A bundle must be valid before it is installed, otherwise
>     the install must fail. The validity of a bundle is discussed
>     in Bundle Validity on page 64."
>
> and one of the validity errors listed on page 64 is:
>
>    "Installing a bundle that has the same symbolic
>     name and version as an already installed bundle."
>
> otherwise you would end up with the same bundle installed
> in two locations, hence these additional validity checks
>
> HTH
>
> > Thank you in advance for your help.
> >
> > Ronan Dunklau
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to