If you still have the problem with trunk, please file an issue with the Distributed OSGi component at CXF: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF
Cheers, David 2009/7/2 Karl Pauls <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Joel Schuster<[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks all, I've figured out what I needed to get things working... >> >> However, I've been forced to use the single bundle distro 1.0 of cxf and >> therefore the old spec for properties. >> >> When I use the 1.1 SNAPSHOT something gets messed up so that the Shell TUI >> stops working. I'm looking into some sort of conflict with the felix' >> webconsole bundle and/or the felix.http.jetty bundle. >> >> Should I just move to felix 1.8.1? > > You might have to move to trunk. > > regards, > > Karl > >> - Joel >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Clement Escoffier [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 3:12 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: iPojo as WebService >>> >>> >>> On 01.07.2009, at 20:02, Richard S. Hall wrote: >>> >>> > On 7/1/09 1:39 PM, Clement Escoffier wrote: >>> >> Last things, to work I started two gateway: >>> >> - Felix 1.8.1 with iPOJO, Compendium, CXF (Snapshot) single bundle, >>> >> AdderServiceInterface and AdderServiceProvider >>> >> - Equinox 3.5 with iPOJO, OSGi service, OSGi Utils, CXF (Snapshot) >>> >> single bundle, AdderServiceInterface, AdderServiceImporter and >>> >> AdderServiceConsumer >>> >> >>> >> For some strange reason, I was not able to import the service from >>> >> Felix... Maybe a detail of CXF that I ignore. equinox 3.5 is >>> >> required as CXF relies on ServiceHooks. >>> > >>> > Felix has implemented the service hooks needed by CXF for a little >>> > while now, I think. Trunk has full support, although I have some >>> > outstanding patches to commit for the TCK. >>> >>> Good news. >>> It works on the latest Felix trunk ! >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Clement >>> >>> >>> > >>> > -> richard >>> > >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> >>> >> Clement >>> >> >>> >> On 30.06.2009, at 20:41, Joel Schuster wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Great, thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> I can't get it to work at all. This actually may be more a >>> >>> question then for the CXF people, just let me know. I'm not sure >>> >>> which properties to set. Based on what you see on those links I >>> >>> referred to, @ServiceProperty is the correct annotation to use, >>> >>> right? >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you know of a single bundle solution that iPojo integrates >>> >>> easily with? I'd like to just provide a simple annotation or >>> >>> config property and have it just make my service available >>> >>> automatically. >>> >>> >>> >>> Why did you make the decision to write your own? >>> >>> >>> >>> - Joel >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>>> From: Bourret Pierre [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:54 AM >>> >>>> To: [email protected] >>> >>>> Subject: Re: iPojo as WebService >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hi Joel. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I'm daily using iPOJO service as web services. I don't use CXF >>> >>>> but a >>> >>>> home-made Distributed Service implementation. However, it should >>> >>>> be very >>> >>>> similar. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Feel free to ask me if you encounter any issue. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Pierre Bourret >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 2009/6/30 Joel Schuster <[email protected]> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> I'd like to expose my iPojo as a WebService. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I'm using the Distributed OSGi single bundle from apache cxf: >>> >>>>> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Based on what I read, (http://cxf.apache.org/dosgi-ds-demo-page.html >>> >>>>> ) >>> >>>>> theoretically I should be able to take a working iPojo based >>> >>>>> service and >>> >>>> add >>> >>>>> add a few @ServiceProperties and deploy a .cfg file with >>> >>>>> FileInstall >>> >>>> bundle: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> osgi.remote.interfaces=* >>> >>>>> osgi.remote.configuration.type=pojo >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> osgi.remote.configuration.pojo.address=http://localhost:9090/mypojoservice >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Has anyone tried this or something similar without having to add >>> >>>>> the >>> >>>>> overhead of going all the way to ServiceMix? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Any help would be appreciated. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> - Joel >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
