And what kind of behavior do you see ? I mean how does it affect the
runtime in any way ?

2010/3/10 Peter Gardfjäll <[email protected]>:
> Right, the problem is not when artifacts are dropped in at runtime.
> The problem is that after a framework restart, the artifacts get
> reported out of order (that is, not in deployment order).
>
> best regards, Peter
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The deployment order should not be significant, unless there is a huge
>> delay between copying two files, but in that case, trying to order the
>> bundles won't matter, since some won't be available at all.  If that's
>> not the case, I would think this is a bug.
>>
>> The main reason is that all bundles are installed before being
>> started, so you should not have any resolution problems, since all the
>> bundles will be installed when the first one is resolved.
>>
>> 2010/3/10 Peter Gardfjäll <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been experimenting some with writing a custom ArtifactInstaller
>>> to extend the functionality of FileInstall.
>>> As part of this effort, I have observed that the directory watcher
>>> processes the files in the deployment/load directory in no particular
>>> order.
>>> I was thinking that since deployment order quite often is important
>>> (at least judging from my experience), would it make sense to have the
>>> directory watcher process files in an "oldest-first" manner (or at
>>> least make the processing order configurable to some extent)?
>>> This would prevent resolution problems for those cases where
>>> bundles/artifacts have been copied to the "pickup directory" in
>>> correct dependency order.
>>>
>>> Does it sound reasonable? If so, I can file a Jira issue.
>>>
>>> best regards, Peter
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to