On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Uk Jiang <ukji...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In OSGi world, system.bundle is another name for org.eclipse.osgi. No, it isn't. This is only true if you are using Equinox.
> Some bundles such as org.apache.xml.serializer_2.7.1.v200902170519, > org.apache.xerces_2.9.0.v200909240008, javax.xml_1.3.4.v200902170245, > org.apache.xml.resolver_1.2.0.v200902170519 list 'system.bundle' in their > Require-Bundle list. Why would they do this? It doesn't appear illegal, although it probably should be. > It looks like that Felix Bundle Repository runtime does not treat > system.bundle as org.eclipse.osgi. As a consequence, the bundles cannot be > resolved. > > It would be great if there is a logic before provisioning to translate > system.bundle to org.eclipse.osgi. Please let me know whether you think. You should file a JIRA about this. If the spec permits system.bundle in the Require-Bundle header, OBR should handle it. That said, you should also raise an issue with whomever created these bundles and ask them to fix the manifests. Justin > > Thanks > Emily > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
