I was at OSGi DevCon last week where that presentation was given and to be fair, the guys did say that the iPojo results were suspicious and that they might be due to some misunderstanding of how to use iPojo since they don't normally use it. But as it was mentioned already by Karl, the code is publicly available so maybe someone can take a look.
Alejandro Endo | Software Designer/Concepteur de logiciels From: Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected], Date: 2014-06-20 01:43 PM Subject: Re: IPojo performance benchmark Hi, First, I just discovered the slides. About the performance benches, I don?t know them, but for sure in the recent versions we didn?t really focus on performances (except if the overhead with really big). The service registration overhead is definitely weird, I will have a look on it. Anyway, so far I?ve applications running from 500 to 5000 services in different context (IoT, Web Applications?). In these case, iPOJO performs pretty well, and its cost is meaningless in comparison of the other costs (network, file system?). Regards, Clement On 20 juin 2014 at 17:41:52, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: Hi Recently I read this article regarding various Dependency manager performance. http://www.slideshare.net/SanderMak/the-ultimate-dependency-manager-shootout-qcon-ny-2014 We are now asking ourself what is the "real" IPojo performance in the field ( actual real enterprise application with thousands of services). Thanks Sylvain Hamel | Software Designer/Concepteur de logiciels Grass Valley, A Belden Brand | Tel:(514) 333-1772 Ext: 3146 3499 Douglas-B.-Floreani, Montreal, Quebec Canada H4S 2C6 Please note our new company name! www.new.grassvalley.com DISCLAIMER: Privileged and/or Confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message, you may not copy, use or deliver this message to anyone. In such event, you should destroy the message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. It is understood that opinions or conclusions that do not relate to the official business of the company are neither given nor endorsed by the company. Thank You. DISCLAIMER: Privileged and/or Confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee of this message, you may not copy, use or deliver this message to anyone. In such event, you should destroy the message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. It is understood that opinions or conclusions that do not relate to the official business of the company are neither given nor endorsed by the company. Thank You.
