Hi Raymond, > On 03 Mar 2015, at 16:24, Raymond Auge <[email protected]> wrote: > […] > However, a metatype implementation change would be required but ONLY for > access to said new "hints" information. This would require: > > 1) reading the extra schema info while parsing the metatype xml > 2) providing API access to the information > > Implementing > 1) is simple, just need to enhance the parser with the fields we decide > 2) I was thinking of something like the following: > […]
IIRC, the MetaType spec already allows for optional attributes to be defined on ADs, Attributes, OCDs and Objects. I believe that this would already cover most of these requirements, not? -- Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect +31 631 765 814 My world is revolving around INAETICS and Amdatu Luminis Technologies B.V. Churchillplein 1 7314 BZ Apeldoorn +31 88 586 46 00 http://www.luminis-technologies.com http://www.luminis.eu KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93 BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
