doh' this isn't Karafs fault ... if you want to install two bundles that are no osgi bundles you have the convenience of installing those non-osgi bundles with the wrap url handler. So what does the wrap-URL-Handler mean, it'll grab the maven artifact and do an automatic osgi bundling to it. How does it do it? It uses bnd for creating a OSGi-Manifest and places it back into the used artifact stored in the osgi-cache.
So at this point it's the fault of the two jars, cause both now export the same packages com.blah.logging which result in a split-package situation. And at this point it's not Karaf that is mad at you it's the OSGi Framework. Since you are posting this to the felix mailinglist (not the karaf one) I guess you are using the default OSGi Framework in Karaf which is Felix. In the end Felix is mad at you because you deployed two bundles exporting the same packages and didn't tell the framework how to handle this split-package situation. How to solve this mess? Try to bundle those non-osgi artifacts into either one big uber-bundle or create two seperate ones with a clear export-package strategy and maybe a declaration for the resolver on how to handle this split-package situation. regards, Achim 2015-06-25 10:49 GMT+02:00 Pedro Domingues <pedro.doming...@ist.utl.pt>: > I have never used karaf, but it seems disappointing. > > I am currently fixing my blog, hence some content like pictures can be > missing. However take a look at the ways I use to embed dependencies and > see if any helps. I use maven: http://web.ist.utl.pt/ist162500/?cat=2 > > On June 24, 2015 10:47:07 PM WEST, Joe <joe.ad...@cmegroup.com> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I'm trying to wrap a couple of jars as a bundle. The main bundle I > >want is > >called logging, but it has dependencies on another bundle called > >logging-common. I am getting them both from maven. However, Karaf is > >mad > >at me because they both contain some of the same packages. They both > >have > >packages called com.blah.logging and com.blah.logging.support. > > > >Would it be possible to wrap them both in a bundle using the wrap > >command in > >bundle, in a feature.xml file? > > > >Do I need a more complex scheme? Would I need to make a bundle that > >imports > >the dependences through maven and then exposes the logging package? > > > >Thanks! > > > > > > > >-- > >View this message in context: > > > http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Complicated-wrapping-tp5013411.html > >Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
