I would add a remote in my repo to the repo of the person submitting the request, and then fetch from it, and then you can do it all in your repo and not keep making clones.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the link. I thought there was probably a way to do this with > cherry-picking. > > I always create a (local) branch for any changes, git svn dcommit from that > branch, and then svn rebase on the trunk branch. > > Do you know if it’s possibly/easy (or how to) copy your changes on github to > a branch in my github felix clone and then cherry-pick from there? I’d expect > that would reduce a combinatorial explosion of remote branches as more people > supplied patches on github. > > I didn’t see 4970 yet… > > thanks > david jencks > >> On Aug 22, 2015, at 7:36 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm sorry, I assumed that you all had a workflow for PR's already. >> >> I can offer you >> https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BensonMargulies/GitSvnWorkflow. >> >> Also, please just ask and I'll be happy to make an 'svn patch' patch. >> >> Note the issue of getting the PRs to close by putting the right thing >> in the svn commit. >> >> There's also 4970, would you like me to make an svn patch for that? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:16 PM, David Jencks >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I applied your fix from 4969 but it was rather difficult and I did it >>> locally with a patch. Is there an explanation of how to pull stuff from >>> github into an apache svn repo? >>> >>> Anyone else think we should consider git for felix? >>> >>> My plans for gogo are to make it find bundles using the system bundle, so >>> the wiring info works even when regions/framework hooks are present. >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2015, at 5:15 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Derek, >>>> >>>> Thanks, that did it. I've got an outstanding PR for some fixes in >>>> gogo, could I perhaps interest you in having a look? I'd proceed to >>>> make some other improvements if I had a process in motion to work with >>>> a committer to get things, well, committed. My next idea in line is to >>>> get the CommandSession out of the usage messages. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Derek Baum <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> set SCOPE = “myscope:gogo:*” >>>>> >>>>> then when you enter: mycmd, it will try: myscope:mycmd, gogo:mycmd, and >>>>> then all other scopes in undefined order. >>>>> >>>>> The ‘type’ command can be used to find which command will be executed: >>>>> >>>>> % type -a mycmd >>>>> mycmd is void myscope:mycmd(Object[]) >>>>> mycmd is void otherscope:mycmd(String, Integer) >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> Derek >>>>> >>>>>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 16:00, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If two bundles both provide an 'exit' command, how do I configure to >>>>>> control which one is found by default? >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
