Solved! Just ignore this. Nothing wrong with the implementation. A little late for me today and did a mistake registering the service.ranking as a string istead as a Integer. A clear rookie mistake :-)
BR, Sten Roger 2015-09-04 23:06 GMT+02:00 Sten Roger Sandvik <[email protected]>: > Ok, sorry. I did find out that it's using service ranking in > AbstractInfo class. And it also seems to be ordering logic inside > FilterHandler. But I think that the FilterHandler are never sorted > before using it in the invocation chain. > > > > > 2015-09-04 22:59 GMT+02:00 Sten Roger Sandvik <[email protected]>: >> Some corrections. I did not notice that the OSGi R6 whiteboard >> functionality has been moved into Felix Http Base project. I looked at >> the code and service.ranking "support" seems to be missing. >> >> Is this by design or just missing? >> >> >> 2015-09-04 22:51 GMT+02:00 Sten Roger Sandvik <[email protected]>: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I am trying out the OSGi R6 whiteboard specification and the Felix >>> Http Whiteboard implementation of it. Since I have multiple filters >>> that should run in a specific order I need some sort of ordering. >>> >>> I remeber that the old implementation used standard OSGi >>> "service.ranking" property to order filters within the chain. Cannot >>> seem to get this working for Felix Http Whiteboard 3.0.0. >>> >>> Anyone else got this problem? >>> >>> BR, >>> Sten Roger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
