Hello, Thank you Alex, it would be nice from you. Regards Philippe
On Monday, February 11, 2013, Alex Harui wrote: > The google site says it is under BSD, but I did not look at the source > code. > It appears the authors did not remove the Adobe SCLA. > > I have not checked to see if the dependency source code also has licensing > problems. Can you do that? If it is just this file, I will try to contact > the author. > > > On 2/11/13 2:11 PM, "Philippe Mouawad" > <p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com<javascript:;> > > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Thanks for answer, but source code contains the following, where do you > see > > BSD licensing ? : > > > > > > /* > > Adobe Systems Incorporated(r) Source Code License Agreement > > Copyright(c) 2005 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved. > > > > Please read this Source Code License Agreement carefully before using > > the source code. > > > > Adobe Systems Incorporated grants to you a perpetual, worldwide, > > non-exclusive, > > no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license, to reproduce, > > prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and > > distribute this source code and such derivative works in source or > > object code form without any attribution requirements. > > > > The name "Adobe Systems Incorporated" must not be used to endorse or > > promote products > > derived from the source code without prior written permission. > > > > You agree to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Adobe Systems > Incorporated > > from and > > against any loss, damage, claims or lawsuits, including attorney's > > fees that arise or result from your use or distribution of the source > > code. > > > > THIS SOURCE CODE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND "WITH ALL FAULTS", WITHOUT > > ANY TECHNICAL SUPPORT OR ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, > > BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS > > FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. ALSO, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OF > > NON-INFRINGEMENT, TITLE OR QUIET ENJOYMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL ADOBE > > OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > > EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > > PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR > PROFITS; > > OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, > > WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR > > OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOURCE CODE, EVEN IF > > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. > > */ > > > > Regards > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Justin Mclean > > <jus...@classsoftware.com <javascript:;>>wrote: > > > >> HI, > >> > >>> As license is hard to understand and not clear regarding what can be > done > >>> with the code, we don't know if we can fork the project on GITHUB. > >> > >> The original code is licensed under the BSD license which is fairly > >> permissive. By my reading it would allow you to fork the project on > GItHub > >> as long as you kept the original BSD license with that code. > >> > >> See > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#Proprietary_software_licenses_compa > >> tibility > >> > >> The BSD license is compatible with the Apache License so code under the > >> BSD can be donated to an Apache project. > >> > >> Justin > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. Ubik-Ingénierie UBIK-INGENIERIE on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikingenierie> UBIK LOAD PACK BLOG <http://www.ubik-ingenierie.com/blog/>
