Hi guys, i googoled for a few minutes and i found this [1] i think you can start finding answers there, it's a bit outdated but the basic logics are the same.
>From our experience problems comes when you are developing for mobile where resources are limited... If you have a quiet quantity of datas to display (for example 100 quiet big records in a list view) Flex works perfectly even if the items renderers are quiet complex MXML based customed, but if you have to manage a lot of data, well, you'll notice the difference... [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4510196/what-is-the-real-difference-between-mxml-and-actionscript-for-mobile What time of project are you going to develop? Cheers Angelo 2013/9/18 Cristian Spiescu <cristian.spie...@gmail.com> > Hello, > > I have an additional question regarding this subject, that intrigued me: > why are MXML renderers slower? Aren't they translated to ActionScript code? > > Thanks. > Best regards, > Cristian. > > > On 18.09.2013 09:46, Federico De Maddalena wrote: > >> Hi, >> I read in some internet web pages, and someone in this group told me, >> that an item renderer wrote in mxml has worse performance than the same >> renderer wrote in pure actionscript. ok i believe and i trust this, but >> are there studies or analysis that demonstate this thesis? particularly, >> it would be interesting to see a comparison with the results on the >> performance. I don't know if someone has already done this study! >> Bye >> Federico >> >> > -- Angelo Lazzari mobile: 0039 347 0090 452 mail: lazzari.ang...@gmail.com ---------------------------- Verificate la corrispondenza del destinatario; in caso contrario vogliate notificare ciò al mittente e, consci della responsabilita'per l'uso indebito, cancellare il messaggio e sue copie / Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify that to the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue use, destroy the message and its copies. ----------------------------
